Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Browner Hamlin's avatar

RE the differences when Eddie does or does not start. I get that the absolute values you are showing are quite close, but given the margins we are playing at to be competing for the league, don't you think a 10% difference is statistically significant? How many areas can we reasonably be expected to see 10% or larger improvements in our outputs?

Expand full comment
stephen pagem's avatar

I can understand people making comments about the relatively few personnel changes made midweek against PSV, with some (many?) players consequently being "overplayed" with resulting injuries.., but I am not sure I entirely buy into this. It might be interesting to see some stats (Scott? Adam?) on this but when I look at fellow premiership sides – the majority of whom are not in Europe – most have a notable list of injuries. We are not alone. Might the intensity of games have changed in recent years? Alternatively, or in addition, should we perhaps look at the ever decreasing duration of pre-season breaks? Might the commercial demands of overseas tours (with some very competitive fixtures included) also have something to do with the spate of injuries? Or should we simply adjust to the "new reality" and lean into this as being very much a "squad game" – and accept that injuries can, and will, happen. Incidentally, I noticed that Brighton yesterday appeared to rest certain players for one half. (Arsenal did so as well in the case of the Viera and Rice, but they were tactical and injury enforced respectively; not pre-planned.) I do wonder if this is something that teams (and most definitely Arsenal) should consider looking at. Players would know from the the outset they were likely to be given 45 mins and play accordingly. Also gives us an opportunity to limit playing times for those players may be in the red zone or who are habitually injured, and to reintroduce players: bringing on Smith-Rowe in the 94th minute isn't going to tell us anything. The fact that half-time substitutions don't count as one of the 5 substitutions is another big bonus in my book. Food for thought?? Finally, we have to acknowledge that, whether through bad luck or otherwise, some players have a propensity to be injured. In the case of Partey we were unlucky because I don't think there was anything in his history pointing to a litany of muscular injuries, but for Zinny I'm afraid his record was not good. Personally speaking, I adore Zinny so much that I would be prepared (and it's not my money after all) to have him fit for only 60% of the season, but fans cannot express surprise when he is injured. Same I am afraid for Nelson - and Tierney when he was around. Jesus's record was also troubling. It's those muscular injuries that kill you - they never seem to go away. Although it's trite to say that "the best ability is availability", there is more than a grain of truth in this. Squad game anyone?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts